Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund et al
as 1:2008cv02652
Plaintiff:
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Industrial Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund et al v. Special Service Company, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01532
Plaintiff:
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Special Service Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, District Council No. 4 et al v. E.C. Naughton Painting Contractors, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00054
Plaintiff:
International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, District Council No. 4, Daniel M. Boody, Mark Stevens and others
Defendant:
E.C. Naughton Painting Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Pension Fund et al v. P & K Express Co., Inc.
as 1:2007cv05533
Plaintiff:
Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
P & K Express Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Village of Bellwood
as 1:2007cv05194
Plaintiff:
Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Village of Bellwood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund et al v. E&L Trucking Company
as 1:2007cv05192
Plaintiff:
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
E&L Trucking Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund et al v. E & K Express Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01905
Plaintiff:
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
E & K Express Co., Inc. and Patrick A. Pitello
Garnishee:
Patrick N. Ryan and Gary Murkowski
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund et al v. Decking and Siding Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01358
Plaintiff:
Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Decking and Siding Inc, Jones and Brown Company Inc and Jones and Brown Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Moore v. Life Insurance Co
as 07-1168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACQUELINE MOORE, individually and as administrator of the Estate of Keith Karwacki, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, a foreign corporation and CIGNA CORPORATION, d/b/a Cigna Group Insurance, a foreign corporation
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
SHARON L. KARWACKI and DEBORAH NAUGHTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
