Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04614
Lead Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
COCHRAN et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20271
Plaintiff:
LAURA COCHRAN and ANTONIO NAVA
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP, MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NAVA v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv06669
Plaintiff:
DALADIER MICHAEL NAVA
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
WILLIAMS et al v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2012cv02263
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN WILLIAMS , EDWARD APONTE , PEDRO ACRE and others
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
NAVAS v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54671
Plaintiff:
PABLO R NAVAS
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CRUZ et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv39347
Plaintiff:
LUIS A NAVAS CRUZ and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
NAVAS et al v. ACANDS INC.
as 2:2011cv39349
Plaintiff:
PABLO R NAVAS and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
NAVA v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv39342
Plaintiff:
JOSE M. NAVA
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
NAVAS et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv39348
Plaintiff:
PABLO R NAVAS and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
