Cases 41 - 50 of 389
DELAFUENTE v. HOLIDAY CVS, LLC
as 1:2022cv24230
Plaintiff:
BLANCA S. DELAFUENTE
Defendant:
HOLIDAY CVS, LLC d/b/a NAVARRO DISCOUNT PHARMACY #10722 and Markel Arrizabalaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bonilla et al v. Clear Blue Insurance Company
as 6:2022cv02335
Plaintiff:
Denny Bonilla and Diana Navarro
Defendant:
Clear Blue Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bonilla et al v. Clear Blue Insurance Company
as 6:2022cv02330
Plaintiff:
Denny Bonilla and Diana Navarro
Defendant:
Clear Blue Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ESCOBAR v. HOLIDAY CVS, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv23933
Plaintiff:
MARIA E. ESCOBAR
Defendant:
HOLIDAY CVS, LLC doing business as Navarro Discount Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Maria Navarro-Martin v. State of Florida
as 22-13409
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIA NAVARRO-MARTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
NAVARRO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19313
Plaintiff:
RICHARD NAVARRO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Navarro-Martin v. State of Florida
as 5:2022cv00405
Petitioner:
Maria Navarro-Martin
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Navarro-Martin v. State of Florida
as 6:2022cv01691
Petitioner:
Maria Navarro-Martin
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
