Cases 1 - 10 of 390
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0228 a Request by Secretary for TRO or Inj. re Poultry
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Paulino v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
as 3:2024cv03298
Plaintiff:
Avner Paulino
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union and Verint Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Frederick Banks v. Secretary of the Navy et al
as 2:2024cv03779
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Secretary of the Navy, Secretary of the Air Force, Secretary of the Marines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Irene Pacheco v. Michael Jeremy Moreno et al
as 2:2024cv03448
Plaintiff:
Irene Pacheco
Defendant:
Michael Jeremy Moreno and United States Department of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carlos Garcia v. Universal Studios LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03115
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Universal Studios LLC, Universal City Studios LLC, NBCUniversal Media, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Blanche Phlaum et al v. Navy Federal Credit Union et al
as 5:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Blanche Phlaum and Jason Jones
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union and DOES 1-100,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
King v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 3:2024cv01919
Plaintiff:
Troy Demond King
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
