Cases 1 - 10 of 159
JOHNSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Defendant:
J NEEL, ENGLE, C CARRIER and others
Plaintiff:
SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SURDAKOWSKI v. DIXON et al
as 5:2024cv00216
Defendant:
E JONES, C M CACCAMIS, T MILLS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SURDAKOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Defendant:
ENGLE, C PUGH, S GREENE and others
Plaintiff:
SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Neel et al
as 3:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
C. Neel, C. Burnett, Nunes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TANNER v. FRENCH et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, DIRECTOR CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDDING v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2023cv24741
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL REDDING
Defendant:
GARY ENGLISH, R BETHEA, JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowden v. Reddish et al
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Elijah Tamar Bowden
Defendant:
Reddish, Lester Fernandez, H.L. Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33371
Plaintiff:
NATHAN NEEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NEEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21602
Plaintiff:
RICHARD NEEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv00802
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Ron DeSantis, Jeffrey R. McClellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
