Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Towler v. Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv40073
Plaintiff:
Neil Towler
Defendant:
Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company and Pacific Life Insurance Company Life Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Grady v. Town Fair Tire Centers of Massachusetts, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv11933
Plaintiff:
Joshua Grady
Defendant:
Town Fair Tire Centers of Massachusetts, LLC, Neil Mellen and Michael Mellen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zucconi v. SRG Technology LLC et al
as 1:2017cv11227
Plaintiff:
Tanya Zucconi
Defendant:
SRG Technology LLC and Neil Sterling
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Benharris v. Zep, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11318
Defendant:
Zep, Inc. and Acuity Specialty Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Neil Benharris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Davine et al v. The Golub Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv30136
Plaintiff:
Shelly J Davine , James E. Williams , Jacob E. Ogden and others
Defendant:
The Golub Corporation , The Price Chopper, Inc , Price Chopper Operating Co. of Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Parris et al v. Cabral
as 1:2013cv11010
Plaintiff:
Edwin Parris , James Antonetti , John Barry and others
Defendant:
Andrea J. Cabral
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gingerella v. Marguerite Concrete, Inc.
as 1:2013cv10886
Plaintiff:
Neil Gingerella
Defendant:
Marguerite Concrete, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gingerella v. Marguerite Concrete, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv10886
Plaintiff:
Neil Gingerella
Defendant:
Marguerite Concrete, Inc. and James Marguerite
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
LUNDY et al v. NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC
as 2:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM F LUNDY , DAVID FRASER , NEIL F SORENSEN and others
Defendant:
NESTLE WATERS NORTH AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
