Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Oklahoma
Neil v. Crow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00698
Petitioner: Michael David Neil
Respondent: Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1153
Wilfong v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv00217
Respondent: United States of America
Movant: Neil Jason Wilfong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Foix v. Custer County Sheriff's Office We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00340
Plaintiff: Johnathan Neil Foix
Defendant: Custer County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pope v. Carns We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv01306
Plaintiff: Lloyd Neil Pope
Defendant: Edwin Carns
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Meek v. Jones et al
as 5:2008cv00206
Petitioner: Colin Neil Meek
Respondent: Justin Jones and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chermack v. Banther et al
as 5:2008cv00122
Plaintiff: Neil R Chermack, Jr
Defendant: Dennis Banther and Kingfisher County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pope v. Miller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv01333
Plaintiff: Lloyd Neil Pope
Defendant: David C Miller, Floyd Fry, Sergeant Meade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pope v. Carns et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv01331
Plaintiff: Lloyd Neil Pope
Defendant: Edwin Carns, Lindsey Municipal Hospital and Dr Magness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pope v. Wiedow et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv01332
Plaintiff: Lloyd Neil Pope
Defendant: Holly Wiedow, Edwin Carns and Halvorson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?