Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Maxwell v. USA
as 2:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
Gregory Neil Maxwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Maxwell v. USA
as 2:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
Gregory Neil Maxwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fields v. Martin et al
as 4:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Fields
Defendant:
Amy Martin, Neil Davis, III, Chanice Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. USA
as 2:2023cv00024
Petitioner:
Gregory Neil Maxwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cain v. Northwest Texas Charleston's Charleston's Hospital et al
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Kenneth N. Cain, Kenneth Neil Kinsrey and Kenneth Neal Cain
Defendant:
Northwest Texas Charleston's Charleston's Hospital, ER Security Guards, NFN Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Klein et al
as 5:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Louis Fred Gonzales
Defendant:
Felix Klein, Scot Say, NFN Weston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilbert v. Cobos et al
as 7:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Reginald C Gilbert
Defendant:
Judge David Cobos, Investigator Bobby Neil and Midland County Pretrial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neil v. Williams et al
as 4:2021cv04250
Plaintiff:
Ray Allen Neil
Defendant:
Dr. Betty Williams, Dr. Owen Murry, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Howard, Jr et al
as 4:2021cv04220
Plaintiff:
Tommy Willis
Defendant:
Lt Anthony Howard, Jr, Lt Neil Hinson, Sgt Gabriel Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noble v. Cooper
as 3:2021cv00827
Petitioner:
Neil Paul Noble
Respondent:
NFN Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
