Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Paprakis v. Skullcandy et al
as 2:2016cv00810
Plaintiff:
Rose Paprakis
Defendant:
Skullcandy, S. Hoby Darling, Doug Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Bradshaw v. Perez
as 2:2016cv00646
Plaintiff:
Neil Bradshaw
Defendant:
Thomas Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0151
Herbert et al v. Jewell et al
as 2:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Herbert , State of Utah and State of Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration
Defendant:
S.M.R. Jewell , Janice Schneider , Neil Kornze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Goode v. Doe
as 2:2015cv00591
Plaintiff:
Robert Neil Goode
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Allred et al v Pacificorp
as 2:2015cv00447
Plaintiff:
Naomi Gadd Allred , Alpha Mountain , Corey Anderson and others
Defendant:
PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State of Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration v. Jewell et al
as 2:2015cv00076
Plaintiff:
State of Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, United States Department of the Interior, Neil Kornze and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ackerman v. US Securities and Exchange Commission
as 2:2015mc00023
Plaintiff:
Neil Ackerman
Defendant:
US Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Irons v. Skougard et al
as 1:2014cv00104
Plaintiff:
Kevin Irons
Defendant:
Neil Skougard, Arnold Van Dugteren, FNU Arrowsmith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nauman v. Utah Highway Patrol et al
as 2:2014cv00560
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Nauman
Defendant:
Utah Highway Patrol and Neil Ekberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Western Rangeland Conservation Association et al v. Jewell et al
as 2:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Western Rangeland Conservation Association , Pearson Ranch , Yardley Cattle and others
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Neil Kornze and Juan Palma
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
