Cases 11 - 20 of 260
Jose Murillo v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2023cv00441
Petitioner:
Jose Murillo
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saul Bruce Preciado v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv00769
Petitioner:
Saul Bruce Preciado
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orlando Sanchez v. Neil McDowell
as 23-55073
Petitioner / Appellant:
ORLANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Duran v. McDowell
as 3:2023cv00051
Petitioner:
Pablo Duran
Respondent:
Niel McDowell and Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jason Daniels v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv00080
Petitioner:
Jason Daniels
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Francisco A. Rodriguez v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2022cv08500
Petitioner:
Francisco A. Rodriguez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jason Cai v. Neil McDowell
as 22-16636
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON CAI
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Daniel Frazer v. Neil McDowell
as 22-16610
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL FRAZER
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Mike Taituave v. Neil McDowell, et al
as 22-55862
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIKE TAITUAVE
Defendant / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Warden, Ironwood State Prison, individual, F. ALVEREZ, Correctional Lieutenant for the Investigative Services Unit at I.S.P., individual, J. FRIAS, Correctional Sergeant for the Investigative Services Unit at I.S.P., individual and others
Ivan Hernandez v.Neil McDowell
as 2:2022cv06444
Petitioner:
Ivan Hernandez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
