Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Maso Capital Investments v. E-House (China) Holdings
as 22-355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Maso Capital Investments Limited, Altimeo Asset Management, Blackwell Partners LLC Series A and others
Defendant / Appellee:
E-House (China) Holdings Limited, Xin Zhou, Neil Nanpeng Shen and others
Maso Capital Investments Limited et al v. E-House (China) Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2020cv02943
Defendant:
David Jian Sun, SINA Corporation, Bing Xiang and others
Plaintiff:
Maso Capital Investments Limited, Crown Managed Accounts SPC for and on behalf of Crown/Maso Segregated Portfolio and Blackwell Partners LLC Series A
Lai v. PPDAI Group Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06716
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Zehui Liu, PPDAI Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Weichen Lai
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund v. Focus Media Holding Limited et al
as 3:2013cv00827
Plaintiff:
Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund
Defendant:
Focus Media Holding Limited , Jason Nanchun Jiang, Kit Leong Low and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arfa v. Mecox Lane Limited
as 12-1326
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Arfa, Individually and on Behalf of all others similalry situated
Movant - Appellant:
Westend Group
Defendant - Appellee:
Mecox Lane Limited, Neil Nanpeng Shen, John J. Ying and others
Palny v. Focus Media Holding Limited et al
as 1:2011cv09051
Plaintiff:
Tom Palny
Defendant:
Focus Media Holding Limited, Jason Nanchun Jiang, Charles Guowei Cao and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Brady v. Mecox Lane Limited et al
as 1:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Walter P. Brady
Defendant:
Mecox Lane Limited , Neil Nanpeng Shen , John J. Ying and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Arfa v. Mecox Lane Limited et al
as 1:2010cv09053
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Arfa
Defendant:
Mecox Lane Limited, Neil Nanpeng Shen, John J. Ying and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
