Cases 31 - 40 of 68
San Pedro-Salcedo v. The Haagen-Dazs Shoppe Company, Inc., et al
as 5:2017cv03504
Plaintiff:
Melanie G. San Pedro-Salcedo
Defendant:
The Haagen-Dazs Shoppe Company, Inc. , Nestle Dreyer's Ice Cream Company and Nestle USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Domynique Denay Hardy et al v. Gerber Products Company et al
as 2:2017cv04313
Defendant:
Does, Gerber Products Company, Nestle Group and others
Plaintiff:
Domynique Denay Hardy and Ryan Jamal Hardy
Nestle USA, Inc. v. Crest Foods, Inc.
as 2:2016cv07519
Defendant:
Crest Foods, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Michelle Gyorke-Takatri et al v. Nestle USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv03893
Plaintiff:
Michelle Gyorke-Takatri and Katie Silver
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc. and Gerber Products Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sean Randall v. Merrick Pet Care, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00139
Defendant:
Does, Merrick Pet Care, Inc., Nestle Purina Petcare, Co and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Randall
McCoy v. Nestle USA, Inc et al
as 3:2015cv04451
Plaintiff:
Elaine McCoy
Defendant:
Nestle USA, Inc and Nestle Mexico, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hodsdon v. Mars, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv04450
Plaintiff:
Robert Hodsdon
Defendant:
Mars, Inc. and Mars Chocolate North America LLC
3rd_party_defendant:
The Hershey Co. and Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery Corp.
Miscellaneou:
Nestle USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melanie Barber et al v. Nestle USA Inc et al
as 8:2015cv01364
Plaintiff:
Melanie Barber, Esther Malone, Robert Malone and others
Defendant:
Nestle Purina Petcare Co and Nestle USA Inc
Nestle USA Inc v. Pervine Foods LLC
as 2:2015cv06527
Plaintiff:
Nestle USA Inc
Defendant:
Pervine Foods LLC
Gyorke-Takatri et al v. Nestle USA, Inc., et al
as 3:2015cv03702
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company and Nestle USA, Inc
Plaintiff:
Michelle Gyorke-Takatri and Katie Silver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
