Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CenturyLink of Florida, Inc. et al v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv02206
Plaintiff:
Central Telephone Company of Virginia doing business as CenturyLink, Embarq Florida, Inc. doing business as CenturyLink, Embarq Missouri, Inc. doing business as CenturyLink and others
Counter Claimant:
AT&T Corp. and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Defendant:
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., AT&T Mobility, LLC, SBC Long Distance, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Central Telephone Company of Virginia, Embarq Florida, Inc., Embarq Minnesota, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Nathan Riensche v. Cingular Wireless, LLC, et al
as 14-35375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN RIENSCHE, individually and on behalf of all the members of the class of persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Cingular Wireless, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation doing business as AT&T Wireless, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES PURCHASING COMPANY LP, a Delaware corporation doing business as Cingular Wireless and others
Jared Peck, et al v. AT&T Mobility, et al
as 09-36113
Plaintiff:
JARED PECK
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BOWDEN, a Washington resident, individually and on behalf of all the members of the class of persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC, a Delaward limited liability company doing business as Cingular Wireless, AT&T MOBILITY, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Cingular Wireless, AKA Cingular Wireless, LLC, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation doing business as AT&T Wireless and others
Nathan Riensche v. Cingular Wireless LLC, et al
as 09-35987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN RIENSCHE, individually and on behalf of all the members of the class of persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CINGULAR WIRELESS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company doing business as Cingular Wireless, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation doing business as AT&T Wireless, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES PURCHASING COMPANY LP, a Delaware corporation doing business as Cingular Wireless and others
Peck et al v. Cingular Wireless LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jared Peck, Jared Peck, James Bowden and others
Defendant:
Cingular Wireless LLC, Cingular Wireless LLC, Cingular Wireless LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
MADGRIGAL v. AT&T Wireless Services Inc et al
as 1:2009at00014
Defendant:
AT&T Wireless Services Inc, New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff:
ANAMIRIA MADGRIGAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Anamiria Madrigal v. AT&T Wireless Services Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00033
Defendant:
AT&T Wireless Services Inc, New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff:
Anamiria Madgrigal
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Shroyer v. New Cingular Wire Se, et al
as 08-55028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNITH SHROYER, Kenneth
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC. and AT&T CORPORATION
Peck v. Cingular Wireless LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00522
Plaintiff:
Jared Peck and Jared Peck
Defendant:
Cingular Wireless LLC, Cingular Wireless LLC, Cingular Wireless LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Peck, et al v. Cingular Wireless, et al
as 06-36027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JARED PECK, individually and on behalf of all the members of the class of persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC, a Delaward limited liability company doing business as Cingular Wireless, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation doing business as AT&T Wireless, NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES PURCHASING COMPANY LP, a Delaware limited partnership doing business as Cingular Wireless and others
Amicus Curiae:
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE UTILITY CONSUMER ADVOCATES and THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
