Cases 1 - 10 of 19
New Mexico Cattle Growers Association et al. v. Vilsack et al
as 2:2022cv00086
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack, randy moore, Michiko martin and others
Plaintiff:
New Mexico Cattle Growers Association, Double Spring Ranch, LLC, New Mexico Federal Lands Council and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. USDOJ, et al
as 17-16679
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and NEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Intervenor-Defendant:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
NEW MEXICO CATTLE GROWERS' ASSOCIATION, NEW MEXICO FEDERAL LANDS COUNCIL and NEW MEXICO FARM AND LIVESTOCK BUREAU
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. USDOJ, et al
as 17-16678
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and NEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellant:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
Intervenor-Defendant:
NEW MEXICO CATTLE GROWERS' ASSOCIATION, NEW MEXICO FEDERAL LANDS COUNCIL and NEW MEXICO FARM AND LIVESTOCK BUREAU
WildEarth Guardians, et al v. USDOJ, et al
as 17-16677
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS and NEW MEXICO WILDERNESS ALLIANCE
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Intervenor-Defendant:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, NEW MEXICO CATTLE GROWERS' ASSOCIATION, NEW MEXICO FEDERAL LANDS COUNCIL and others
New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2015cv01065
Plaintiff:
New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association , Jim Chilton , New Mexico Farm & Livestock Bureau and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Sally Jewell, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Washington Cattlemen's Assn, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-4188
:
In re: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FINAL RULE: CLEAN WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF "WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES:, 80 FED.REG.37,054, PUBLISHED ON JUNE 29, 2015. (MCP NO. 135)
Petitioner:
WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, OREGON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION and others
Intervenor:
UTILITY WATER ACT GROUP, PUGET SOUNDKEEPER and SIERRA CLUB
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, GINA MCCARTHY, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and others
Washington Cattlemen's Assn., et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-3419
Petitioner:
Washington Cattlemen's Association, California Cattlemen's Association, Oregon Cattlemen's Association and others
Respondent:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Gina McCarthy, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Washington Cattlemen's Association et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as MN/0:15-cv-03058
Plaintiff:
Washington Cattlemen's Association , California Cattlemen's Association , New Mexico Cattle Growers Association and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency , Gina McCarthy , United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Washington Cattlemen's Association et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 0:2015cv03058
Plaintiff:
Washington Cattlemen's Association , California Cattlemen's Association , New Mexico Cattle Growers Association and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency , Gina McCarthy , United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
New Mexico Farm & Livestock Bureau, et al. v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.
as 2:2015cv00428
Plaintiff:
New Mexico Farm & Livestock Bureau , New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association and New Mexico Federal Lands Council
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Sally Jewell, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
