Cases 1 - 10 of 18
CONN v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2020cv00234
Defendant:
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY, EMPIRE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD and NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS WELFARE FUND
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J CONN, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
NEW JERSEY SPINE AND ORTHOPEDICS, LLC v. NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS BENEFIT FUNDS,
as 2:2019cv12248
Defendant:
New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, JOHN DOE 1-100, NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS BENEFIT FUNDS, and others
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY SPINE AND ORTHOPEDICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, AND APPRENTICESHIP, JOURNEYMAN RETRAINING, EDUCATIONAL AND INDUSTRY FUND v. CREW CONTRACTING OF NJ INC
as 2:2018mc00220
Petitioner:
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, AND APPRENTICESHIP, JOURNEYMAN RETRAINING, EDUCATIONAL AND INDUSTRY FUND
Respondent:
CREW CONTRACTING OF NJ INC
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, AND APPRENTICESHIP, JOURNEYMAN, RETRAINING, EDUCATIONAL AND INDUSTRY FUND et al v. B&L MOVING AND INSTALLATION, INC. et al
as 2:2018mc00134
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, AND APPRENTICESHIP, JOURNEYMAN, RETRAINING, EDUCATIONAL AND INDUSTRY FUND , TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY CARPENTERS RELIEF AND CHARITY FUND and THE NEW YORK CITY AND VICINITY CARPENTERS LABOR-MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Defendant:
B&L MOVING AND INSTALLATION, INC. and R&L OFFICE FURNITURE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, et al. v. JM. KELC MARINE CONTRACTORS CORP.
as 2:2017mc00376
Petitioner:
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, et al.
Respondent:
JM. KELC MARINE CONTRACTORS CORP.
Frederick Stampone v. Matthew Walker, et al
as 17-2660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK STAMPONE
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW WALKER, Director of Operations, NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, NORTHEAST CARPENTERS FUNDS and others
KYLE CONTI CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION AND RELATED FUNDS et al
as 2:2017cv04099
Plaintiff:
KYLE CONTI CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION AND RELATED FUNDS and NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS FOR DOCKBUILDERS LOCAL UNION NO. 1456 and/or 1556
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KYLE CONTI CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION AND RELATED FUNDS et al
as 3:2017cv04099
Plaintiff:
KYLE CONTI CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Defendant:
NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION AND RELATED FUNDS and NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS FOR DOCKBUILDERS LOCAL UNION NO. 1456 and/or 1556
Counter_claimant:
NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION AND RELATED FUNDS
Counter_defendant:
KYLE CONTI CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, APPRENTICESHIP, JOURNEYMAN RETRAINING, EDUCATIONAL AND INDUSTRY FUND, et al. v. RICHIE JORDAN CONSTRUCTION INC.
as 2:2016mc00037
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, APPRENTICESHIP, JOURNEYMAN RETRAINING, EDUCATIONAL AND INDUSTRY FUND, et al.
Defendant:
RICHIE JORDAN CONSTRUCTION INC.
STAMPONE v. WALKER et al
as 2:2015cv06956
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK STAMPONE
Defendant:
MATTHEW WALKER and NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
