Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Franke v. Fifth Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration, et al
as 23-1376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARRID FRANKE
Defendant / Appellee:
FIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN, NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN BENEFITS ADMINISTRATOR and NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN COMMITTEE
Franke v. Fifth Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration, et al
as 23-1362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JARRID FRANKE
Defendant / Appellant:
FIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN, NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN BENEFITS ADMINISTRATOR and NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN COMMITTEE
Franke v. Fifth Amended and Restated Newfield Exploration Company Change of Control Severance Plan et al
as 1:2021cv02234
Plaintiff:
Jarrid Franke
Defendant:
FIFTH AMENDED AND RESTATED NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN, NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN COMMITTEE and NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN BENEFITS ADMINISTRATOR
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1332
Buffington v. Ovintiv USA Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02477
Defendant:
Ovintiv USA Inc. and Newfield Exploration Company
Plaintiff:
Morgan Buffington
Swafford v. Newfield Exploration Company et al
as 1:2019cv02746
Defendant:
Newfield Exploration Company and Newfield Exploration Mid-Continent Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Lansden Swafford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Little et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2005cv01397
Defendant:
Eni Petroleum Company Inc, BP America Production Company, Burlington Resources Offshore Inc and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Randy L Little and Lanis G Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
