Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Windy Cove, Inc. et al v. Circle K Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01416
Plaintiff:
Windy Cove, Inc., AAA Able, Inc. a California corporation, doing business as University City Mobil and South Bay, S&G Zavaro, Inc. a California corporation, doing business as Miramar Mobil and others
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc. and Does 1 through 20
Counter Defendant:
University City Mobil and South Bay, Mike's Liquor Property, LLC, Kazmo, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Newkirk et al v. Allstate Indemnity Company
as 2:2014cv01315
Plaintiff:
Daralee Newkirk and Scott Newkirk
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Newkirk's Santa Fe Service, Inc. v. Exxonmobil Oil Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv02305
Counter Claimant:
Circle K Stores Inc, ExxonMobil Corporation and ExxonMobil Oil Corporation
Defendant:
Circle K Stores Inc, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, ExxonMobil Corporation and others
Counter Defendant:
Newkirk's Santa Fe Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Newkirk's Santa Fe Service, Inc.
Newkirk's Santa Fe Service, Inc. v. Exxonmobil Oil Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv02497
Plaintiff:
Newkirk's Santa Fe Service, Inc.
Defendant:
Exxonmobil Oil Corporation , Exxonmobil Corporation , Circle K Stores Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Exxonmobil Corporation, Exxonmobil Oil Corporation and Circle K Stores Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Newkirk's Santa Fe Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Light Petroleum Inc et al v ExxonMobil Oil Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv04689
Plaintiff:
Syed A Adil, Adobe Petroleum Inc, Alicia Laguna Inc and others
Defendant:
Circle K Stores Inc, Does, ExxonMobil Corporation and others
Bexten v. Newkirk et al
as 2:2011cv01660
Defendant:
American Debt Sales, LLC, Mike Newkirk, Leonard Potillo and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Bexten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
