Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Montgomery v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01579
Plaintiff:
Elaine Montgomery
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation, NewRez, LLC and New Residential Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Aguinaga v. Newrez, LLC
as 1:2022cv02947
Plaintiff:
Martha E. Aguinaga
Defendant:
Newrez, LLC and Newrez, LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kaufman v. NewRez LLC
as 1:2021cv06641
Plaintiff:
Samuel Kaufman
Defendant:
NewRez LLC, f/k/a New Penn Financial, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, NewRez LLC formerly known as New Penn Financial doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and New Penn Financial
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robbins v. NewRez LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03755
Plaintiff:
Sandra J. Robbins and Sandra Robbins Henderson
Defendant:
NewRez LLC, f/k/a New Penn Financial, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, U.S. Bank Trust National Association, 1900 Capital Trust II and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03350
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Guethle v. NewRez LLC
as 1:2021cv03063
Defendant:
NewRez LLC
Plaintiff:
Russell Guethle
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
