Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sullivan v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2021cv00086
Plaintiff:
Erin Sullivan
Defendant:
Peak Campus Management, LLC and Brian Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart v. Ly et al
as 1:2019cv01117
Defendant:
Mark Cotterell, Nguyen Ly, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nguyen v. FCI Berlin, Warden et al
as 1:2018fp00828
Defendant:
Doe #3, Doe #2, US Postal Services Personnel and others
Plaintiff:
Diep Van Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salem, NH, Town of v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Defendant:
Jacqueline Nguyen and US Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Salem, NH, Town of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Salem, NH, Town of v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2017cv00097
Defendant:
Jacqueline Nguyen and US Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Salem, NH, Town of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Nguyen v. Snyder et al
as 1:2014cv00314
Defendant:
James Bussone, Don Jones, Samuel A. Kidston and others
Plaintiff:
Khoa D. Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Nguyen v. USA
as 1:2012cv00235
Petitioner:
Van Thi Nguyen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nguyen v. USA
as 1:2011cv00319
Petitioner:
Van Thi Nguyen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mesko, et al v. Cabletron Systems, et al
as 1:1997cv00542
Consol Plaintiff:
Philip Adler, Karen Borick, Richard Durr and others
Defendant:
All Defendants, Craig R. Benson, Cabletron Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, BGC Investment Club, BYSG Capital and others
Consol Defendant:
David J. Kirkpatrick, Donald F. McGuinness and Don Reed
Interested Party:
Timothy M. Smith, Sr.
Notice Only:
US District Court - RI, Clerk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
