Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Pike v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Nichole Pike
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nichols v. Warnecke
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Randy Dean Nichols
Defendant:
John Michael Warnecke, Mathew Ellis, Adam Rummer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nichols v. Adecco USA, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv03803
Plaintiff:
Deanna Nichols
Defendant:
Honda Development & Manufacturing of America LLC, Adecco USA, INC., Honda Development & Manufacturing of America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Nichols v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03612
Plaintiff:
Tara Nichols
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nichols v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02946
Plaintiff:
Monica Nichols
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R.Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nichols v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02774
Plaintiff:
Tammy Nichols
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Giles et al v. Stay Dry Waterproofing, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00688
Plaintiff:
David Giles, Morgan Brey, Matt Dotson and others
Defendant:
Stay Dry Waterproofing, LLC and MARK MINTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nichols v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Ronald Nichols
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Graham v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04511
Plaintiff:
Nichole Bernadette Graham
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
