Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Ronald Hood #235278 v. Jeffrey Woods, et al
as 14-2114
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD KING HOOD
Defendant - Appellee: JEFFREY WOODS, Warden, Warden, NICK LUDWICK, Warden, RICHARD STAPLETON, Hearings Administrator and others
Larry Lee v. Dean Willey, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1359
Plaintiff - Appellant: LARRY LEE
Defendant: DEAN WILLEY, R. WILLIAMS, T. ZISCHKE and others
Defendant - Appellee: KAMESHWARI MEHRA
Kenneth Harn v. Nick Ludwick
as 12-2585
Petitioner - Appellant: KENNETH LOUIS HARN
Respondent - Appellee: NICK LUDWICK, Warden
Larry Lee v. Dean Willey, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2393
Plaintiff - Appellant: LARRY LEE
Defendant - Appellee: DEAN WILLEY, T. ZISCHKE, BAGLEY and others
Defendant: R. WILLIAMS, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Michael Williams v. Nick Ludwick
as 12-2115
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL C. WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee: NICK LUDWICK, Warden
Willie Riddle v. Nick Ludwick
as 12-1572
Petitioner - Appellant: WILLIE EARL RIDDLE
Respondent - Appellee: NICK LUDWICK, Warden
Kevin Ragland v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 12-1334
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN RAGLAND
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Municipality, NICK LUDWICK, Warden, MITCHELL ROSS and others
Adrian Nichols v. Nick Ludwick
as 12-1085
Petitioner - Appellant: ADRIAN NICHOLS
Respondent - Appellee: NICK LUDWICK, Warden
Philandes Williams v. Gonzales, et al
as 11-2649
Plaintiff - Appellant: PHILANDES WILLIAMS
Defendant: GONZALES, ARUS
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK, Inspector, NICK LUDWICK, Warden and ROBERT STERBA, Officer
Thomas Earls v. Michigan Department of Correct, et al
as 10-2585
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS EARLS
Defendant - Appellee: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in their official capacity, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, JEFFREY WOODS, Warden and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?