Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dachev v. Funko Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00544
Defendant:
Funko, Inc, Brian Mariotti, Russell Nickel and others
Plaintiff:
Blagovest Y. Dachev, Blagovest Y Dachev, Gerber Kawasaki, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
William Hurt, Abdul Baker, Zhibin Zhang and others
Berkelhammer v. Funko, Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00812
Defendant:
BMO Capital Markets Corp., Brian Mariotti, Adam Kriger and others
Plaintiff:
Satyanarayana Kanugonda and Carl Berkelhammer
Petitioner:
A. Parikh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Jacobs v. Funko, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00481
Plaintiff:
Keith Jacobs
Defendant:
Funko, Inc., Brian Mariotti, Russell Nickel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Baskin v. Funko, Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00281
Plaintiff:
Ernest Baskin
Defendant:
Funko, Inc. , Brian Mariotti , Russell Nickel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Surratt v. Funko, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00283
Plaintiff:
Michael Surratt
Defendant:
Funko, Inc. , Brian Mariotti , Russell Nickel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
The Ronald and Maxine Linde Foundation v. Funko, Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
The Ronald and Maxine Linde Foundation
Defendant:
Funko, Inc. , Brian Mariotti , Russell Nickel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Lowinger v. Funko, Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00201
Plaintiff:
Robert Lowinger
Defendant:
Funko, Inc , Brian Mariotti , Russell Nickel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
United States of America v. Nickels et al
as 2:2017mc00043
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jacob Dyson Nickels
Garnishee:
Fidelity Investments
United States of America v. Nickels et al
as 2:2017mc00002
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jacob Dyson Nickels
Garnishee:
Starbucks Coffee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
