Cases 21 - 30 of 87
Barnes v. Ige et al
as 1:2018cv00034
Petitioner:
William Jackson Gay Barnes
Respondent:
Ige, Nolan Espinda, Francis Sequiera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
D'Agirbaud v. Alanzo et al
as 1:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Quintin-John D'Agirbaud, III
Defendant:
Sarah Alanzo, Dovie Borges, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Clair v. Matsuoka et al
as 1:2017cv00573
Plaintiff:
Stephen Keith St. Clair
Defendant:
Bert Y. Matsuoka, Michael A. Town, Joyce Matsumori-Hoshijo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mueller v. State of Hawaii Department of Public Safety, et al.
as 1:2017cv00571
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A. Mueller
Defendant:
State of Hawaii Department of Public Safety , Freddie Carabbacan, Francis Sequeira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Lester et al
as 1:2017cv00452
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Rebecca S. Lester, Hawaii Paroling Authority, Director of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almond v. Espinda
as 1:2017cv00440
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Sharon Almond
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Ted Sakai , State of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Feagai et al
as 1:2017cv00369
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Sgt. Feagai, HCF Inmate Grievance Specialist, M. Keopuhiwa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Uehara et al
as 1:2017cv00312
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Nolan Uehara, Jan Molina, Vaovasa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Head of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit et al
as 1:2017cv00303
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Head of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Thomas Doe, Canby Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brisken v. Mun et al
as 1:2017cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jhon Nigel Brisken
Defendant:
Wesley Mun and Nolan Espinda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
