Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States of America v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al.
as 4:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Loyd et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 4:2023cv00626
Plaintiff:
Michael Loyd, Zoey Spellman, Jennifer Gray and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
State of Ohio v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al.
as 4:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio and United States of America
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of Ohio v. Cabot Corporation, et al
as 1:2012cv01099
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio
Defendant:
Cabot Corporation , CBS Operations, Inc. , The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
United States of America et al v. Cabot Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01097
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cabot Corporation , CBS Operations Inc. , Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Conrail, Inc. et al v. Acme Scrap Iron and Metal Company
as 1:2010cv02705
Plaintiff:
Conrail, Inc. and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Acme Scrap Iron and Metal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
City of Ashtabula v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00364
Plaintiff:
City of Ashtabula, City of Ashtabula and City of Ashtabula
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ashtabula River Cooperation Group II v. Conrail, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv03311
Plaintiff:
Ashtabula River Cooperation Group II and Ashtabula River Cooperation Group II
Defendant:
Conrail, Inc., Consolidated Rail Corporation, American Premier Underwriters, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
State of Ohio, ex rel., Betty D. Montgomery et al v. Chemical Land Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2002cv00193
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio, ex rel., Betty D. Montgomery
Defendant:
Chemical Land Holdings, Inc., Maxus Energy Corporation, Crompton Manufacturing Company, Inc., and others
Cross Defendant:
Occidental Chemcial Corporation, Painsville Township Board of Trustees, Village of Fairport Harbor and others
Cross Claimant:
Scepter Management Corporation, Inc. and Painesville PRP Group
Counter Defendant:
Tiera Solutions, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Philip Metals Recovery (USA) Inc. and Aluminum Smelting & Refining Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Maxus Energy Corporation et al v. Ace Lakefront Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2000cv00972
Cross Defendant:
Maxus Energy Corporation, Chemical Land Holdings, Environmental Brine Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Ace Lakefront Properties, Inc., Dartron Corporation, Eltech Systems Corporation and others
Counter Defendant:
Cousins, Inc. and Scepter Management Corporation
3Rd Party Defendant:
Aluminum Smelting & Refining Company, Inc. and Occidental Chemcial Corporation
Cross Claimant:
Philip Metal Recovery (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
