Cases 91 - 100 of 165
MINDLER v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 5:2008cv05807
Plaintiff:
RICHARD T. MINDLER
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
COLLINS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv04742
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. COLLINS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DEVAULT v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89558
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. DEVAULT
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GASSNER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89240
Plaintiff:
WALTER L. GASSNER, JR.
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SPENCER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv89342
Plaintiff:
EARL W. SPENCER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SANTOS et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv04521
Plaintiff:
CURT SANTOS and ROSANNE SANTOS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BENSON v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv85541
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS BENSON
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCGUIRE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv03602
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. MCGUIRE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KEECH v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv03240
Plaintiff:
HAROLD L. KEECH
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FRITCHMAN v. NORFOLK SOUTERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv02559
Plaintiff:
DAVIDA FRITCHMAN
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
