Cases 11 - 20 of 21
O'NEAL v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2016cv00519
Plaintiff:
PHILIP O'NEAL
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCMICHAEL v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
JASON G MCMICHAEL
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
ROBERSON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, et al
as 5:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
CHAVELLA ROBERSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
BOSTON v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2012cv00387
Plaintiff:
TYRONE BOSTON
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
WINDOM v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 5:2012cv00345
Plaintiff:
PAUL WINDOM
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and SHARON R HEYOB
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
FEREBEE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER FEREBEE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
CLEMENTS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2011cv00322
Plaintiff:
MILLON R CLEMENTS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
DUHART v NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2011cv00260
Plaintiff:
JAMES W DUHART, JR
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Bodison v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 5:2011cv00182
Plaintiff:
Melvin H Bodison
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Windom v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 5:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
Paul Windom
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
