Cases 11 - 20 of 165
DONGARA v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2015cv00872
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. DONGARA
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
HOUSER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 2:2015cv00762
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HOUSER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and SUZANNE CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0153
NOBLES v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2014cv05595
Plaintiff:
SHEREE NOBLES
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
HALL v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2014cv60000
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY L HALL
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEACH v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2014cv00143
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PEACH
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
VODHANEL v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05512
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL G. VODHANEL
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
ROBENOLT v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05430
Plaintiff:
ALLEN R. ROBENOLT
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
CROSS v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv04170
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. CROSS
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
MONROE v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv03567
Plaintiff:
DAN A. MONROE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
JOHNSON v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv02372
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
