Cases 71 - 80 of 125
Smelser v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2013cv00936
Plaintiff:
Claude Smelser
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Gardner v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2013cv01925
Plaintiff:
Stuart Gardner
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Stiltner v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2013cv00458
Plaintiff:
Roy E. Stiltner
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Dials v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2013cv01412
Plaintiff:
Olen Dials
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Taylor v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2013cv01316
Plaintiff:
James Taylor
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Rogers v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2013cv00798
Plaintiff:
John A Rogers
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Head et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 1:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Glenn R Head and Lori Head
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company , Invensys Rail Corporation and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Henry v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2012cv01159
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey K Henry
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Izzard v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2012cv01253
Plaintiff:
John Izzard
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Deel v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2012cv00218
Plaintiff:
Martha Deel
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
