Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Massachusetts Nurses Association v. North Adams Regional Hospital
as 3:2014cv30055
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Nurses Association
Defendant:
North Adams Regional Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East v. North Adams Regional Hospital
as 3:2012cv30033
Plaintiff:
1199SEIU United Healthcare Workers East
Defendant:
North Adams Regional Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
ANNA JAQUES HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2009cv02390
Plaintiff:
ANNA JAQUES HOSPITAL, BROCKTON HOSPITAL, INC., COOLEY DICKINSON HOSPTIAL, INC. and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Anna Jaques Hospital, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius
as 08-5529
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Anna Jaques Hospital, Baystate Medical Center, Inc., Berkshire Medical Center and others
Petitioner - Appellee:
Mercy Hospital, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Charles E. Johnson, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and Michael O. Leavitt, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
In re: Medicare Reim, et al, et al
as 04-5203
In Re:
In re: Medicare Reimbursement Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Baystate Health Systems, doing business as Baystate Medical Center, Berkshire Health Systems, doing business as Berkshire Medical Center, Brocton Hospital and others
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Brigham Plaintiffs, Brigham & Women's Hospital, The General Hospital Corporation and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael O. Leavitt, Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
