Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rodriguez v. Suffolk County
as 22-224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rafael Rodriguez
Defendant / Appellee:
Suffolk County
Defendant:
Police Department of Suffolk County, N.Y., Suffolk County Jail and North Shore LIJ Health System
Williams v. North Shore LIJ Health System
as 2:2015cv01595
Defendant:
North Shore LIJ Health Systems
Plaintiff:
Andre Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv06496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Weinberg, MD v. North Shore-LIJ Health System
as 1:2013cv03208
Plaintiff:
Joy Weinberg, MD
Defendant:
North Shore-LIJ Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rodriguez v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2013cv00782
Defendant:
North Shore LIJ Health System, Police Department of Suffolk County, N.Y., Suffolk County and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01499
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05563
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01556
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
