Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Belton Monroe et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05022
Plaintiff: Belton Monroe, Jessica Monroe, Greg Moore and others
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Innovative Fund I, L.P. v. The Nottingham Company, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2020cv01888
Defendant: Sanville & Company, The Nottingham Company, Inc. and Does 1-50, inclusive
Plaintiff: Innovative Fund I, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Nottingham v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv04993
Plaintiff: Marion Nottingham
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Monsanto Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv02142
Plaintiff: Fredrick Smith, Rexford Martin, Ronald Matheny and others
Defendant: Monsanto Company, Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Nottingham v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2016225500007
Petitioner: Monte James Nottingham
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nottingham v. USA
as 3:2016cv00007
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Monte James Nottingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nottingham v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2016225500006
Petitioner: Monte James Nottingham
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nottingham v. USA
as 3:2016cv03851
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Monte James Nottingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nottingham v. USA
as 3:2016cv00006
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Monte James Nottingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nottingham v. USA
as 3:2016cv03852
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Monte James Nottingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?