Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NOVELTY, INC. v. WESTERN CONVENIENCE STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv02303
Defendant:
Western Convenience Stores, Inc. and Pester Marketing Company
Plaintiff:
NOVELTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NOVELTY, INC. v. ROTHSCHILD
as 1:2013cv00497
Plaintiff:
NOVELTY, INC.
Defendant:
MARGARET ROTHSCHILD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
COACH, INC. et al v. NOVELTY, INC.
as 1:2010cv00615
Plaintiff:
COACH SERVICES, INC. and COACH, INC.
Defendant:
NOVELTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
NOVELTY, INC. v. E-Z MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2009cv01213
Plaintiff:
NOVELTY, INC. and NOVELTY, INC.
Defendant:
E-Z MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
NOVELTY, INC. v. PRESS PASS, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00823
Plaintiff:
NOVELTY, INC. and NOVELTY, INC.
Defendant:
PRESS PASS, INC., PRESS PASS, INC., RC2 CORPORATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
NOVELTY, INC. v. RCB DISTRIBUTING, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00418
Plaintiff:
NOVELTY, INC. and NOVELTY, INC.
Defendant:
RCB DISTRIBUTING, INC. and R&B SALES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NOVELTY, INC. v. JACOB'S PARADISE, INC.
as 1:2008cv00079
Plaintiff:
NOVELTY, INC. and NOVELTY, INC.
Defendant:
JACOB'S PARADISE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
NOVELTY, INC. v. LEISURE TIME PRODUCTS, INC.
as 1:2007cv01317
Plaintiff:
NOVELTY, INC. and NOVELTY, INC.
Defendant:
LEISURE TIME PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
NOVELTY, INC. v. MOUNTAIN VIEW MARKETING, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv01229
Defendant:
MOUNTAIN VIEW MARKETING, INC. and MCLANE COMPANY, INC.
Interested Party:
Kevin M. Boyle, Overhauser & Lindman, LLC, Tami Napier and others
Plaintiff:
NOVELTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
