Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Rivas Nunez v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00706
Petitioner:
Tauri Benjamin Rivas Nunez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hayes, Cordney v. Dixxon et al
as 4:2024cv10033
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Yvonne Dixxon, Yasmin Oaks, Luis Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Oaks et al
as 4:2023cv10119
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Yasmin Oaks, Luis Ibarra, Talika Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NUNEZ v. DAVID et al
as 3:2023cv24725
Plaintiff:
ANDREW NUNEZ
Defendant:
J DAVID, B JONES and J HOLLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. David et al
as 5:2023cv00688
Plaintiff:
Andrew Nunez
Defendant:
J. David, B. Jones and J. Hollis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NUNEZ v. JOHNSON
as 3:2023cv21428
Plaintiff:
IXIO NUNEZ
Defendant:
G A JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. United States Of America
as 0:2023cv61366
Plaintiff:
Kiara Nunez
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Watson v. Quinones et al
as 6:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Jermetras Deangelo Watson
Defendant:
Chief Louis A. Quinones, Jr., Judge Tarlika Nunez-Navarro, Officer of Orange Co Dalton Hammer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez-Cebrero v. United States of America
as 6:2023cv00991
Petitioner:
Roberto Nunez-Cebrero
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Nunez-Reyes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 9:2023cv80364
Plaintiff:
William Nunez-Reyes
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
