Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MOSS v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00228
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN RAYMOND MOSS
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
HART v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 2:2012cv06168
Plaintiff:
APRIL HART
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 260
ADAMS v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 2:2012cv05689
Plaintiff:
ERICA H. ADAMS
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2609 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
DUKE v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv05179
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DUKE
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BOLGER et al v. CHASE BANK USA, N.A. et al
as 2:2012cv04133
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. BOLGER and LAURIE B. BOLGER
Defendant:
CHASE BANK USA, N.A. and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
KELLY v. OCWEN FEDERAL BANK, FSB et al
as 2:2012cv01501
Plaintiff:
CLARA KELLY
Defendant:
OCWEN FEDERAL BANK, FSB and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PETERSON v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 2:2010cv06988
Plaintiff:
BELINDA PETERSON
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
MALNICK et al v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv05263
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MALNICK and BRENDA MALNICK
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
