Cases 71 - 80 of 119
SADLER et al v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 2:2013cv03412
Plaintiff:
ROY SADLER and FRANKA SADLER
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DIXON v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 5:2013cv03199
Plaintiff:
DENNIS KEITH DIXON
Defendant:
OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION , OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and DOES 1 THRU 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MOSS v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00228
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN RAYMOND MOSS
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
HART v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 2:2012cv06168
Plaintiff:
APRIL HART
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 260
ADAMS v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
as 2:2012cv05689
Plaintiff:
ERICA H. ADAMS
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2609 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Slavemini
as 3:2012cv01966
Plaintiff:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Defendant:
Kim Slavemini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v. Bell et al
as 1:2012cv01965
Plaintiff:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Defendant:
Delores Bell and Jacqueline Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
CAVE et al v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05366
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. CAVE and PAMELA L. SMITH
Defendant:
SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DUKE v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv05179
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DUKE
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
