Cases 1 - 10 of 15
THOMAS v. AVILEZ et al
as 2:2023cv20777
Plaintiff:
DARIUS LECEAN JOSEPH THOMAS
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILEZ, BECKY SCOTT, MICHAEL DANTICO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. AVILEZ et al
as 2:2022cv05943
Plaintiff:
JEROME LAMAR YOUNG
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILEZ, MICHAEL LNU and HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00872
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv09529
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01904
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PLUBPLUNG v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv05699
Petitioner:
TIRAYUTN PLUBPLUNG
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THOMPSON v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01418
Petitioner:
SHAWN ANDRE THOMPSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TCHIKAYA v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv05480
Petitioner:
VICTOR PADI TCHIKAYA
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv02691
Petitioner:
ROGER ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent:
MICHEAL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KIANI v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv02200
Petitioner:
BIJAN ANARAKI KIANI
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
