Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Avilez v. Department of Corrections
as 9:2017cv80985
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Oscar Avilez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jimenez v. Avilez
as 1:2016cv09779
Petitioner:
Felipe Miguel Jimenez
Respondent:
Oscar Avilez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diaz v. Avilez
as 1:2016cv09700
Petitioner:
Jose Martir Gutierre Diaz
Respondent:
Oscar Avilez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PLUBPLUNG v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv05699
Petitioner:
TIRAYUTN PLUBPLUNG
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THOMPSON v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01418
Petitioner:
SHAWN ANDRE THOMPSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TCHIKAYA v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv05480
Petitioner:
VICTOR PADI TCHIKAYA
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv02691
Petitioner:
ROGER ANTHONY JOHNSON
Respondent:
MICHEAL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KIANI v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv02200
Petitioner:
BIJAN ANARAKI KIANI
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ALLEN VS CHERTOFF, ET AL et al
as 2:2007cv02198
Petitioner:
ALFRED R. ALLEN
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JOHN P. CARBONE and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FELIX v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2007cv01742
Petitioner:
ROMEL FELIX
Respondent:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and OSCAR AVILEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
