Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Pandora Media, LLC, et al
as 23-55741
Plaintiff / Appellant: FLO & EDDIE, INC., a California corporation, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: PANDORA MEDIA, LLC, a Delaware corporation and DOES, 1 through 100
Oren Franks et al v. Lens.com, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03870
Plaintiff: Oren Franks and Others similarly situated
Defendant: Lens.com, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Waite v. UMG Recordings, Inc.
as 23-195
Plaintiff: Joe Ely, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Israel Caballero, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Earle R. Ely, Jr., AKA Joe Ely
Plaintiff / Appellant: John Waite, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Stan Sobol, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Stan Lee, Kasim Sulton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Counter Claimant: Capitol Records, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: UMG Recordings, Inc., DBA Universal Music Group
Defendant: UMG Recordings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and Does 1 though 10
Yan Zhao, et al v. Keqiang Li, et al
as 22-7152
Plaintiff / Appellant: Yan Zhao, Amer Group LLC, An Bang Group LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: Keqiang Li, For his official capacity of The Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Shuqing Guo, The CCP Party Secretary The Branch Committee of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC), Hua Yu, the Secretary of the CCP Branch for China Insurance Security Fund Co., Ltd. and others
Yan Zhao, et al v. Keqiang Li, et al
as 22-7138
Plaintiff / Appellant: Yan Zhao, Amer Group LLC, An Bang Group LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: Keqiang Li, For his official capacity of The Politburo of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Shuqing Guo, The CCP Party Secretary The Branch Committee of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) for China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC), Hua Yu, the Secretary of the CCP Branch for China Insurance Security Fund Co., Ltd. and others
Gilbert Saucillo, et al v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, et al
as 22-55560
Plaintiff / Appellee: GILBERT SAUCILLO and JAMES R. RUDSELL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: JOHN BURNELL and JACK POLLOCK
Appellant: SADASHIV MARES
Defendant / Appellee: SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY OF ARIZONA, LLC, an Arizona corporation
Defendant: SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY INCORPORATED and DOES
Lawrence Peck, et al v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC, et al
as 22-55468
Plaintiff / Appellee: GILBERT SAUCILLO and JAMES R. RUDSELL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: JOHN BURNELL and JACK POLLOCK
Appellant: LAWRENCE PECK
Defendant / Appellee: SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY OF ARIZONA, LLC, an Arizona corporation
Defendant: SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY INCORPORATED and DOES
Alexis Hunley, et al v. Instagram, LLC
as 22-15293
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALEXIS HUNLEY and MATTHEW SCOTT BRAUER, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee: INSTAGRAM, LLC
David Lowery, et al v. Rhapsody International, Inc.
as 22-15162
Plaintiff / Appellee: DAVID LOWERY, VICTOR KRUMMENACHER, GREG LISHER and others
Defendant / Appellant: RHAPSODY INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation
Nicklen et al v. Mashable, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv10300
Defendant: Advance Publications, Inc., CONDE NAST ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Tegna, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Paul Nicklen and Cristina Mittermeier
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?