Cases 1 - 10 of 10
VARGAS v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
as 1:2024cv02680
Plaintiff:
MELODY VARGAS
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reichert et al v. Otis Elevator Company
as 1:2023cv15674
Plaintiff:
Lisa Reichert and Thomas Reichert
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Stanton v. Otis Elevator Company
as 1:2021cv03776
Plaintiff:
Maurice Stanton
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company and United Technologies Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcelo v. Otis Elevator Company
as 1:2018cv05759
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Plaintiff:
Marc Marcelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kurzynski v. Otis Elevator Company
as 1:2018cv02296
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kurzynski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawkins v. Ameristar Casino East Chicago LLC, et al
as 1:2017cv01369
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey T Dawkins
Defendant:
Ameristar Casino East Chicago LLC , Ameristar East Chicago Holdings, LLC , Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Layne v. Otis Elevator Company
as 3:2015cv00903
Plaintiff:
Janet L. Layne
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kennedy v. Otis Elevator Company et al
as 1:2015cv06398
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company and Boyd Gaming
Plaintiff:
Robin Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Layne v. Otis Elevator Company
as 3:2013cv00502
Plaintiff:
Janet L. Layne
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dichristofano v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The et al
as 1:2007cv02250
Plaintiff:
Laura Dichristofano and Laura Dichristofano
Defendant:
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The, Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., The, Otis Elevator Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
