Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wintrode v. Captain Hughes, et al.
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Captain Hughes, Sgt. Ron Owen, Deputy Rebecca Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wintrode v. Carter et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Tom Carter, Chris Hogan, Randall Buffalo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
B-3-88-A, et al. v. Sileoni 98822
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
William B-3-88-A, Linzy, Thompson and others
Defendant:
Sileoni 98822
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kesling v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2020cv00334
Defendant:
Warden Jay Christensen, Director Josh Tewalt, Rhonda Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Kesling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McDermott v. State of Idaho et al
as 3:2019cv00432
Defendant:
Jonathan Medena, Patrick Owen, State of Idaho and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Ryan McDermott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roles v. Christensen et al
as 1:2019cv00292
Defendant:
Rhonda Owens and Jay Christensen
Plaintiff:
Raymond Roles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Blades et al
as 1:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Robert Jennings
Defendant:
Randy Blades, Susan Wessels, Timothy McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. State of Idaho
as 1:2015cv00550
Plaintiff:
Faron R. Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Idaho, C.L. "Butch" Otter, Molley Huskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teton v. Dixey
as 1:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Rydon Clyde Teton
Defendant:
Clyde Owen Dixey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breinholt v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2013cv00147
Plaintiff:
Michael Breinholt
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Idaho Supreme Court, Idaho Supreme Court Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
