Cases 1 - 10 of 174
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Oakes v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Oakes
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cartwright et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Laurie Cartwright and Kandi Oakes
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hoipkemier et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Adam Hoipkemier and Kevin Epps
Defendant:
Duane V. Miller, Eric Macleod, Oak Ridge Project Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
HOWARD v. GOLDEN AGE OAK VIEW HOME LLC
as 5:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
LECRISTAL HOWARD
Defendant:
GOLDEN AGE OAK VIEW HOME LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PCPRE, LLC v. Morris
as 1:2023cv04888
Plaintiff:
PCPRE, LLC doing business as Royal Oaks
Defendant:
Jeremy Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
