Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Odom v. Fhurer
as 6:2023cv01789
Petitioner:
Alonzo Odom
Respondent:
Corey Fhurer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Odoms v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
as 6:2019cv01111
Petitioner:
Donald C. Odoms
Respondent:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Odom v. Murphy et al
as 6:2019cv00831
Defendant:
Tara Cox and Dr. Murphy
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Odom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. Russ
as 6:2019cv00832
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Odom
Defendant:
Dan Russ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odoms v. Kelly et al
as 6:2019cv00702
Petitioner:
Donald C. Odoms
Respondent:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision and Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Odoms v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
as 6:2019cv00074
Petitioner:
Donald C. Odoms
Respondent:
Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Odoms v. Kelly
as 6:2018cv01122
Petitioner:
Donald Odoms
Respondent:
Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Odoms v. Kelly et al
as 6:2018cv00125
Respondent:
Brandon Kelly and Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen, Lisa Hay and Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Donald Odoms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Odoms v. Oregon State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
as 6:2017cv00775
Petitioner:
Donald Odoms
Respondent:
Oregon State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Odom v. Attachmate Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00406
Plaintiff:
Gary Odom
Defendant:
Attachmate Corporation, Austhink USA, Inc., BAE Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
