Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Danley v. Office Depot, Inc. et al
as 9:2014cv81469
Plaintiff:
Brian Danley and Anthony McIntosh
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc. and Officemax North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv61892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
PRESSLEY v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
as 0:2014cv61183
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE PRESSLEY
Defendant:
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Christopher Lowell Enterprises, LLC et al v. Office Depot Inc.
as 9:2014cv80584
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lowell Enterprises, LLC and Richard Madden
Defendant:
Office Depot Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Aerofund Financial, Inc. v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 9:2014cv80420
Plaintiff:
Aerofund Financial, Inc.
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Office Depot, Inc. v. TECHNICOLOR SA et al
as 9:2013cv81174
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc.
Defendant:
TECHNICOLOR SA, TECHNICOLOR USA, INC., VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2013cv80750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Wiseman v. Office Depot, Inc. et al
as 9:2013cv80697
Plaintiff:
Debbie Wiseman
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc. and The Office Depot, Inc. Welfare Benefit Program
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Parker v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 9:2012cv81077
Plaintiff:
Terry Parker
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Office Depot, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 9:2011cv81263
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc.
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi America, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
