Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Yolanda Banks-Reed, et al v. Joseph Mateu, III, et al
as 20-17085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YOLANDA BANKS-REED, individually, S.A.T., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem Ciara Turner, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent SAHLEEM TINDLE, THE ESTATE OF SAHLEEM TINDLE, by and through its administrator LARON MAYFIELD and others
Defendant:
DOES, Bay Area Rapid Transit police officers DOES 1-50 inclusive, CARLOS ROJAS, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for Bay Area Rapid Transit police department and BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, a municipal corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH MATEU III, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for Bay Area Rapid Transit police department
Yolanda Banks-Reed, et al v. Joseph Mateu, III, et al
as 19-17444
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YOLANDA BANKS-REED, individually, S.A.T., a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem Ciara Turner, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent SAHLEEM TINDLE, THE ESTATE OF SAHLEEM TINDLE, by and through its administrator LARON MAYFIELD and others
Defendant:
DOES, Bay Area Rapid Transit police officers DOES 1-50 inclusive, CARLOS ROJAS, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for Bay Area Rapid Transit police department and BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, a municipal corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH MATEU III, individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for Bay Area Rapid Transit police department
D'Amato v. Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2018cv04397
Plaintiff:
Irina Ioana D'Amato
Defendant:
Health and Human Services, Children Protective Services, Tracy Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Amato v. Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2018cv04397
Defendant:
City & County of San Francisco, Health and Human Services, San Francisco Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Irina Ioana D'Amato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
