Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sorenson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00804
Defendant:
Canvas Ct LLC, Cleaver-Brooks Inc, Honeywell International Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Norita C Sorenson and Reid S Sorenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Stuart et al v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01508
Plaintiff:
Samuel Price Stuart and Anita Louise Stuart
Defendant:
ABB Inc , American Electric Power Company Inc, Autozone Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2015cv05546
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Advance Ross Corp , BNSF Railway Company, bp product north america, inc. and atlantic richfield company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
United States of America et al v. Advance Ross Sub Co et al
as 3:2015cv05548
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Washington , Puyallup Tribe of Indians and others
Defendant:
Advance Ross Sub Co, BNSF Railway Company, BP Products North America Inc and Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
May v. OfficeMax Incorporated
as 2:2015cv00627
Plaintiff:
Denise May
Defendant:
OfficeMax Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Emery v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2014cv01473
Plaintiff:
Susan Emery
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America , The OfficeMax Incorporated Short Term Disability Insurance Plan and OfficeMax Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
OfficeMax Incorporated v. 500 Mercer Partners, LLC
as 2:2009cv00988
Plaintiff:
OfficeMax Incorporated and OfficeMax Incorporated
Defendant:
500 Mercer Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Lewis v. OfficeMax Incorporated et al
as 2:2008cv00713
Plaintiff:
Andrea Lewis
Defendant:
OfficeMax Incorporated and OfficeMax of North America Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
