Cases 1 - 4 of 4
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION et al v. MELISSA DATA CORP. et al
as 2:2024cv04292
Plaintiff:
ATLAS DATA PRIVACY CORPORATION, AS ASSIGNEE OF INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE COVERED PERSON, JANE DOE-1, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JANE DOE-2, A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER and others
Defendant:
Melissa Data Corp., RICHARD ROES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALS and ABC COMPANIES 1-10, FICTITIOUS NAMES OF UNKNOWN ENTITIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Sherelle Thomas, et al v. City of Harrisburg, et al
as 21-3018
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHERELLE THOMAS, Administrator of the Estate of Terelle Thomas and T. T., a minor, individually, as child of decendentTerelle Thomas and as his sole survivor
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF HARRISBURG, OFFICER DARIL FOOSE, OFFICER SCOTT JOHNSEN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DAN KINSINGER
Sherelle Thomas, et al v. City of Harrisburg, et al
as 21-2964
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHERELLE THOMAS, Administrator of the Estate of Terelle Thomas and T. T., a minor, individually, as child of decendent Terelle Thomas and as his sole survivor
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF HARRISBURG, HARRISBURG CITY POLICE DEPT JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICERS 1-5, TRAVIS BANNING and others
Defendant / Appellant:
OFFICER DARIL FOOSE and OFFICER BRIAN CARRIERE
Defendant:
PRIMECARE JOHN DOES MEDICAL EMPLOYEES 1-5
Sherelle Thomas, et al v. City of Harrisburg, et al
as 21-2963
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHERELLE THOMAS, Administrator of the Estate of Terelle Thomas and T. T., a minor, individually, as child of decendentTerelle Thomas and as his sole survivor
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF HARRISBURG, OFFICER DARIL FOOSE, OFFICER BRIAN CARRIERE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
OFFICER SCOTT JOHNSEN, ADRIENNE SALAZAR and TRAVIS BANNING
Defendant:
HARRISBURG CITY POLICE DEPT JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICERS 1-5, DAUPHIN COUNTY PRISON JOHN DOE PRISON OFFICIALS 1-5 and PRIMECARE JOHN DOES MEDICAL EMPLOYEES 1-5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
