Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00733
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00734
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Sun Minnesota Foreign Holdings, et al v. MN Airline
as 10-6070
Debtor:
In re: MN Airlines, LLC, doing business as Sun Country Airlines
Objector - Appellant:
Sun Minnesota Foreign Holdings, LLC, Sun Minnesota Domestic Holdings, LLC and Sun Credit, LLC
Debtor - Appellee:
MN Airlines, LLC
Claimant - Appellee:
Petters Aviation, LLC, Petters Aircraft Leasing, LLC and Douglas Arthur Kelley, as Chapter 11 Trustee for Petters Group Worldwide, LLC and Petters Company, Inc. and as the court-appointed Receiver for Thomas J. Petters and Thomas Petters, Inc.
Creditor - Appellee:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, of MN Airlines, LLC d/b/a Sun Country
Interested Party - Appellee:
County of Riverside, California, United States of America and Tarrant County, a political subdivision of the States of Texas and Tennessee
Sun Minnesota Foreign Holdings, et al v. MN Airline Holdings, Inc.
as 10-6071
Debtor:
In re: MN Airline Holdings, Inc.
Objector - Appellant:
Sun Minnesota Foreign Holdings, LLC, Sun Minnesota Domestic Holdings, LLC and Sun Credit, LLC
Debtor - Appellee:
MN Airline Holdings, Inc.
Claimant - Appellee:
Petters Aviation, LLC, Petters Aircraft Leasing, LLC and Douglas Arthur Kelley, as Chapter 11 Trustee for Petters Group Worldwide, LLC and Petters Company, Inc. and as the court-appointed Receiver for Thomas J. Petters and Thomas Petters, Inc.
Creditor - Appellee:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, of MN Airlines, LLC d/b/a Sun Country
Interested Party - Appellee:
County of Riverside, California, United States of America and Tarrant County, a political subdivision of the States of Texas and Tennessee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
