Cases 11 - 20 of 1,948
Goodykoontz v. State Of Ohio
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
David Goodyhoontz and David Goodykoontz
Defendant:
State Of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al.
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jason White
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, CO Kristen Dreezen, CO Brandon Waller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Jones v. Dave Yost
as 24-3184
Petitioner:
MATTHEW JONES
Respondent:
DAVE YOST, Ohio Attorney General
Lumpkin Jr. v. Core Civic Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
as 4:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Lumpkin Jr.
Defendant:
Core Civic Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sowell v. The Ohio State University et al
as 2:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Salvatore Juliano Sowell
Defendant:
The Ohio State University and Franklin County Sheriff's Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. The State Of Ohio
as 2:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Tasha Chapman
Defendant:
The State Of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunter v. Lucas County et al.
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Olivia Hunter
Defendant:
Lucas County, Correction Center of Northwest Ohio, Corrections Commission of Northwest Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Lettieri v. NEOCC
as 24-3113
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Phillip Jacobs v. Marion Correctional Institution, et al
as 24-3092
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP DOUGLAS JACOBS
Defendant:
MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY and others
Darren Taylor v. Annette Chambers-Smith
as 24-3085
Plaintiff:
DARREN X. TAYLOR
Defendant:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
