Cases 11 - 20 of 324
Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc., et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-1324
Petitioner:
Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc., Deseret Generation & Transmission Co-Operative, d/b/a Deseret Power Electric Cooperative, Ohio Valley Electric Corporation and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. EPA
Buckeye Power, Inc., et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-1317
Petitioner:
Buckeye Power, Inc. and Ohio Valley Electric Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Agency
Intervenor:
Appalachian Mountain Club, Ohio Environmental Council and Sierra Club
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia, New York City, State of Connecticut and others
Energy Transfer LP v. EPA, et al
as 23-1316
Petitioner:
Energy Transfer LP
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United Sates Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
Appalachian Mountain Club, Ohio Environmental Council and Sierra Club
Not Yet Classified:
TransCanada Pipeline USA Ltd.
American Lung Association, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1140
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator
Petitioner:
American Lung Association and American Public Health Association
Intervenor:
State of Kansas, Phil Bryant, Governor of the State of Mississippi, State of Texas and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
DELISIO v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2023cv03351
Plaintiff:
RONALD MICHAEL DELISIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF OHIO, OFFICE OF THE BISHOP - DIOCESE OF CLEVELAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner:
State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified:
ConservAmerica
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae:
Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc., et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-1276
Petitioner:
Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc., Deseret Generation & Transmission Co-Operative, d/b/a Deseret Power Electric Cooperative, Ohio Valley Electric Corporation and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. EPA
BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND v. OHIO BUILDING MAINTENANCE LEASING, INC.
as 1:2023cv01890
Plaintiff:
BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND
Defendant:
OHIO BUILDING MAINTENANCE LEASING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
