Cases 21 - 30 of 138
Allen v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 4:2020cv01746
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Allen
Intervenor Defendant:
Ohio State Penitentiary
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Howard
as 1:2019cv01073
Plaintiff:
Tarome Boyd
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Howard
Interested Party:
State of Ohio State Of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. State Of Ohio et al
as 2:2019cv02137
Plaintiff:
Rafiq Jones
Defendant:
Director, Taylor Graves, State of Ohio State Of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Phillips v. Columbus Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv01120
Defendant:
Michael Hughes, Officer Ty Stoneking, Judge Richard Frye and others
Plaintiff:
Earnest L Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. State Of Ohio et al
as 2:2019cv00709
Plaintiff:
Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Defendant:
Lyneal Wainwright, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, State of Ohio State Of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeder v. Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary
as 2:2019cv00105
Respondent:
Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary
Petitioner:
Joseph Q. Reeder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Holton v. State Of Ohio
as 2:2018cv01489
Respondent:
State of Ohio State Of Ohio
Petitioner:
Byron J Holton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. State Of Ohio et al
as 2:2018cv01322
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1-100, State of Ohio State Of Ohio and Ohio Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
John Louis Turner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norfleet v. Ohio State Penitentiary
as 2:2018cv00834
Petitioner:
Joshua Norfleet
Respondent:
Ohio State Penitentiary and Warden, Ohio State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
